Artificial Boundaries!

Yesterday in class the professor Claire Smith said something to the extent of who gives anyone the right to create boundaries. She was talking in a global way about boundaries between countries. This has made me think about other boundaries that are made as well. For instance, we make boundaries between you and me in a number of ways. We can not be honest with each other. We could lash out at each other, or any other defense mechanism can create this boundary. We also create boundaries along gender, class and ethnic lines. We assume that because we are different that the other can never really understand. There might be some truth to that. We really can't completely understand another person until we "walk two moons in their moccasins" (Sharon Creech, "Walk Two Moons" its a book check it out). But I do think that we need to let other people into our world by having a dialogue with them. We need to sit down with someone different from ourselves and talk out what goes on it that person's daily life. Honest sharing and empathetic listening will really go a long way in breaking down these artificial barriers. There is a line in a Less Than Jake song that goes, "Everyone here, hates everyone here for doing the same thing that they do." I wonder if in those dialogues we would find this line to be true.

I also want to talk about another kind of boundary line that is drawn in theology that seems completely artificial. This line is between the doctrines. We have all of these fancy names for the doctrines like eschatology (end times), ecclesiology (church), Theological Anthropology (humanity), Soteriology (salvation), Christology (Jesus), and the list goes on and on. Well, I think that these divisions between the doctrines cannot be understood in Christian thought without understanding the others. Systematic Theologians throughout history have tried to take these doctrines and put them into a neat system. I don't see how that can be done. I don't think that this system would be neat at all. The divisions themselves are not neat. Where does who Jesus the Christ is end and salvation begin? How do we understand humanity without understanding both Jesus and God? The lines between these doctrine are too fuzzy to even really call them separate things. Theology has tried to put God in a box to dissect God, but separating all of these doctrines from each other only serves to weaken God. Theology is really about the organic flow that happens between the doctrines. We can separate all we want but there is an equilibrium that is found it doctrinal theology that is not stagnant at all. Equilibrium occurs by a continuous movement of particles in and out of the system, therefore theology is more about the fuzzy lines between the doctrines then it is about the doctrines themselves. We only have doctrines so that we can organize our thoughts easier, but I feel that this organization is keeping people from understand our God, who is an untamed, wild lion of a God (just ask C.S. Lewis in the Narnia books).

There you go something practical and abstract for your reading please.

Peace,
Mark